Why is humanity so pathetically cheap?, and other observations from XCOM
We will publish our full review of XCOM: Enemy Unknown when it’s good and ready, so pipe down. In the meantime, here is a patchwork of our thoughts from the first few hours of Firaxis’ game.
1. Humanity is extremely cheap, given the impending alien annihilation. Having to bow and scrape to the international lords of politics and finance for what they make to seem the – privilege – of defending Earth really makes you wonder if it’s all worth it. I mean, if these people really wanted saving, wouldn’t they pony up the cash for more than a squad of like six soldiers?
Humanity should be like this:
2. I have mixed feelings about the game’s art style. It’s clean and pleasing and competent, which given the muddled aesthetics of almost every videogame, is high praise. On the other hand, it flirts with cartoonishness, which has a dampening effect on the extreme tension created by the game.
3. Oh yes, that tension. Several times in my five hours with XCOM, I’ve felt close to reaggravating an old hernia simply from trying to decide whether to shoot or hunker down. What’s that you say? I might have a mood disorder? True enough, but the game is super tense anyway. It will make you want a Xanax in the best way.
4. The “build your base” screen is a dollhouse for big boys and girls.
5. The nicknames the game assigns your veterans are incredible. So far I have a “Crater” (he fires rockets) a “Longshot” (self-explanatory) and a “Freud” (not sure).
6. My roommate makes the point, which goes above my head, that XCOM is a gamified management operations case, as they call it in the business world. I don’t understand this, but it sounded really smart so I wanted to share it with you. Here’s how he tried to explain it to my peon brain in Gchat:
you have to choose cycle timeswhat to invest inlike, the problem is “you run an electronics company”you have 12 million in cashdo you invest ina. improving battery lifeb. new productc. improved cycle times (produce more)and then you decide distribution routesthat minimize costusing solver in excelanyway, it kind of sucksbut its a little fun because the environment and competitors changeand you try to be profitableit, as well, is turn based – you choose r&D expenseand direction and then see what happensbut it is EXACTLY your game, minus the physical shooting and 3-D graphics
7. Allow me to pull on my geek hat for a moment? One sec, just trying to get the fur wings down over my ears. Ok. The camera takes a fixed isometric perspective that allows you to see 3/4rs of the battlefield. You can rotate it 45 degrees at a time. This is a hassle and is pointless. You should be able to rotate it granularly. Sorry for that last sentence. I once made a promise to myself I would never write the sentence “you should be able to rotate it granularly”, and look at what I just did.
Sigh. I’ll be playing XCOM if you need me.
